Discussion Question Response

Discussion Question Response

Question: Chapter 3 in Rosenstand’s The Moral of the Story deals with the issue of moral truth—what is the morally right thing to do in a particular situation and what are the correct principles or guidelines for a living a morally good life? Moral subjectivism is the view that moral propositions are true only relative to the particular beliefs of a particular person or subject of experience; ethical relativism is the view that what is good, right, and morally correct is true relative to a particular cultural tradition and set of behavioral practices; and moral absolutism (this is what Rosenstand calls “hard universalism” is the view that there are universal moral truths or principles that hold for everyone, everywhere, at all times and under any circumstances.

The most common viewpoint adopted by college students today is ethical relativism, and this is probably because it seems to be the most tolerant and fair-minded position, in that it respects diversity and individuality. However, Rosenstand points to a number of problems with ethical relativism. Where do you place yourself on this spectrum of moral stances? Are you a moral skeptic or a moral subjectivist? an ethical relativist? a moral absolutist? If you have never thought about this before, now is the time to do so. Explain why you hold the viewpoint you do, and defend that view from what might be seen as at least one major difficulty with adopting that ethical stance. Alice Walker’s novel, Possessing the Secret of Joy (1992), presents a strong case against ethical relativism by denouncing the practice of female circumcision, or perhaps more accurately termed, female genital mutilation, a traditional practice of certain cultures that is seen as morally correct, as not only the right thing to do, but something that one is morally obligated to do. If you are an ethical relativist, you should be able to show why Walker is wrong for condemning this practice as morally wrong. If those who carry out the practice believe that it is the morally right thing to do, who is Walker, or who is anyone with different beliefs, to tell them they are wrong?

-read the Chapter 1,2,3, then answer the question above

-In the essay-style forums responses, you should express a point of view and support your view with good reasons, evidence, examples, expert opinion, etc.

Literary Analysis

Literary Analysis

The Story we are analyzing is Gilgamesh and it may be compared to 1001 nights. The poem should be analyzed as a whole but mainly focused on women roles and women place in society. NO PLAGARISM AND NO SUMMARY. This essay should break down the meanings line by line behind what the author really meant. Examples have been provided. The paper should analyze women roles within the story and how it changes the aspects of the story and the importance it plays in  the story. Paper must mainly focus on that and nothing more a little background to prove the point is allowed.  Examples and direction sheets have been provided

DETECTION OF SMOKE USING ARDUINO

DETECTION OF SMOKE USING ARDUINO

 

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction

Smoke is primarily a visible suspension of carbon particles in air normally caused by burning of substances. Smoke detector senses smoke only and must be connected to a fire alarm system control panel. Smoke detectors are a detection device only – not an alarm. Smoke alarm detects smoke and sounds an alarm. Smoke detectors are used in large buildings and commercial areas where as smoke alarms are found in private residences. Early developments in design of smoke alarm began in 1922 with observations by Greinacher and later by Walter Jaeger in 1930.Smoke alarms use basically two types of sensors to detect smoke either through ionization or through photoelectric methods. Smoke alarms may contain either or both methods.

Ionization smoke alarms were introduced in U.S in the mid 1950’s. These early models used 240 volts of AC to operation. Smoke alarms using photoelectric technology were introduced in the early 1960’s. Early smoke detectors require high voltage, continuous research of smoke alarms lead to the development of battery powered easily portable smoke alarms. These made an increase in the use of smoke alarms and easily installable in housing premises too. The most recent developments have made smoke detectors even smarter. These smarter smoke detectors can be easily monitored and are accessible from any place.

Smoke alarms helped to save thousands of lives in the United States since their introduction and extensive use during the past two decades (Istre, 2000). There is good news to know that there is at least one smoke alarm in the 90% of homes in the United States. Universal fire-related damages result in more than 300,000 demises (Cooper, 2011). The U.S. Fire Administration reports stated that two thirds of the people who die annually in fires where smoke alarms are either not present or not working (Taylor, 2014).

In this project we design a microcontroller based smoke alarm which will continuously monitor and trigger an alarm for a significant amount of presence of smoke. This smoke alarm also contains an LCD monitor for visual alert as well as a WIFI module enabling to mobile monitoring.

1.2. Statement of purpose

Smoke alarms are the best innovation which help to reducing the rate of residential fire deaths (Frattaroli et al, 2016). Residential fires present threats to the public health and safety (Gielen,2014). The purpose of this study is to develop a circuit which is economical and reliable used to detect the smoke and activate an alarm.

1.3. Statement of problem

Safety is the primary concern in any residential or commercial premises. Smoke and fire are the key elements in safety considerations. This project study helps to design an Arduino microcontroller smoke alarm system. This system continuously monitors and calibrates the amount of the different particles present in the smoke for different types of commercial and residential buildings. This system can also be continuously monitored regarding the smoke levels remotely.

1.4. Research Objectives

The primary objective of this project is to design a microcontroller based smoke alarm to detect the presence of smoke and to activate an alarm.

· Analysis and calibration of Arduino microcontroller.

· Analysis and calibration of MQ-2 smoke sensor.

· Analysis and installation of ESP8266 WIFI module.

· Installation of LCD display and LED to develop visual warnings indicating the presence of smoke.

· Installation of buzzer to display audio warnings to indicate the presence of smoke.

1.5. Experimental Approach

This project uses an Arduino micro-controller, MQ-2 smoke sensor to detect the presence of smoke. This project also uses a I2C LCD display and an ESP8266 WIFI module to display and notify the presence of smoke. The MQ-2 sensor is very accurate and can detect the presence of smoke including different types of gas concentrations present. The MQ-2 library has in built value codes which makes it precise in the detection of different smoke and gas concentrations.

1.6. Significance of Study

Working smoke alarms reduce the risk of death in the event of housefire by 50%. Having a working smoke alarm with a long-lasting lithium battery on every level of the home is the recommended best practice according to the centers for disease control and prevention (Gielen,2014). The design of smoke alarm system in this project is more user friendly and reliable because of the high sensitivity of smoke sensor. This system is very economical which is easily affordable for anyone.

1.7 Limitations

· The sensor is of smoke type and it does not indicate the presence of fire.

· Smoke alarm system should be connected to a continuous unlimited power supply.

· Considering the location, position of the system and the area of the hall the reaction of the smoke alarm system may be altered.

· Due to the high sensitivity and continuous usage of the system, the sensor may lead to damage because of the heat developed.

Mythology Questions

Mythology Questions

1. How do specific actions of the heroes illustrate these values?

 

 

2. What different types of reward do the different characters seek?

 

 

Please take into account how harsh conditions, treachery and death are woven into this myth.

 

3.Does the end justify the means?  Do intentions justify the end?

 

 

4. Where does evil come from and where does it breed?

 

How to Read Literature Like a Professor

How to Read Literature Like a Professor

Template

 

DIRECTIONS: Complete the template for EACH chapter of Professor (“Introduction” through “Envoi”). You may need more than one sheet per chapter depending on the chapter and how large you write (blue/black ink or typed). You may either use the template or write your responses on regular paper using the same two-box format. Note that you will need the other Professor handout to complete the template.

 

Chapter Number & Name Take notes on the key details of the chapter, including moments of nuance. Your notes should be bulleted.
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Answer the chapter questions on the other Professor page. As part of your response, apply the key parts of this Professor chapter to Frankenstein (if possible) and the other text listed in the chapter question. Note that when the chapter question only has you focus on Frankenstein, application to another text is not necessary. Answers should take the form of a developed paragraph.
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Philosophy Exam

Philosophy Exam

Here are the instructions for exam 2. You need to respond to 4 out of 5 sets of questions. If you will respond to more than 4 sets of questions, I will not correct anything beyond the 4th set of questions. You can have 105 or 110 possible number of points (with 5 or 10 extra-credit points). Two sets of questions have 30 possible number of points each and three sets of questions have 25 possible number of points each. You need to submit exam 2 on Wednesday (June 8) in class. . If any of your responses is a product of cheating or plagiarizing, then you get a zero on exam 2. If two or more students have the same or very similar responses, then I will initially treat their exams as cases of cheating.

PHIL 190: Exam Two – Select 4 out of 5.

1. In Descartes’ argument for the existence of the body, what guarantees its independence from the mind and what guarantees that one’s perception of it is not a mere product of some deceitful schemes? Explain your answers. Give accounts of Descartes’ explanation for mind-body interaction and the problems with such an explanation. (25 points)

2. Give an account of Kant’s critique of rationalism and empiricism. Give an account of Kant’s epistemological theory that, in some sense, attempts to reconcile rationalism and empiricism. Rationalists generally argue that, since there are principles that are universally agreed upon by all humans, such principles must have been based on innate ideas. Give an account of Locke’s response to such argument and his case for the sensible or experiential ground of the use of reason. (30 points)

3. For Descartes, what form of knowledge can be proven as incorrigible through methodical doubt? Why is it incorrigible? What is the relevance of such proof in establishing the existence of the mind as something that exists independently of the body? How can we use his proof of its incorrigibility as an illustration for the rationalist claim that reason (not the senses) is the sufficient guide to truth? How can the foundations of scientific and mathematical knowledge be considered corrigible through methodical doubt? (30 points)

4. In your own words, briefly state Papineau’s causal argument for materialism. What is the abstract claim that he considers to be a necessary presupposition of his argument? Why is it important for him to presuppose such a claim? What is his general response to any objection that denies any of his premises? (25 points)

5. Give an account of Jackson’s possible objection to Papineau’s abstract claim. Based on Jackson’s knowledge argument, give an account of his case for his objection. Critics of Jackson’s epiphenomenalism generally point out that there is something counterintuitive about the claim that mental states do not causally interact with physical states. Give an account of Jackson’s response to such critics. (25 points)

Modernism And Imagism As Its Byproduct: Ezra Pound And T.S. Eliot As The Most Vivid Representatives Of Same

Modernism And Imagism As Its Byproduct: Ezra Pound And T.S. Eliot As The Most Vivid Representatives Of Same

THE LOVE SONG OF J. ALFRED PRUFROCK

S’io credesse che mia risposta fosse
A persona che mai tornasse al mondo,
Questa fiamma staria senza piu scosse.
Ma percioche giammai di questo fondo
Non torno vivo alcun, s’i’odo il vero,
Senza tema d’infamia ti rispondo.

Let us go then, you and I,

When the evening is spread out against the sky

Like a patient etherized upon a table;

Let us go, through certain half-deserted streets,

The muttering retreats

Of restless nights in one-night cheap hotels

And sawdust restaurants with oyster-shells:

Streets that follow like a tedious argument

Of insidious intent

To lead you to an overwhelming question …

Oh, do not ask, “What is it?”

Let us go and make our visit.

In the room the women come and go

Talking of Michelangelo.

The yellow fog that rubs its back upon the window-panes,

The yellow smoke that rubs its muzzle on the window-panes,

Licked its tongue into the corners of the evening,

Lingered upon the pools that stand in drains,

Let fall upon its back the soot that falls from chimneys,

Slipped by the terrace, made a sudden leap,

And seeing that it was a soft October night,

Curled once about the house, and fell asleep.

And indeed there will be time

For the yellow smoke that slides along the street,

Rubbing its back upon the window-panes;

There will be time, there will be time

To prepare a face to meet the faces that you meet;

There will be time to murder and create,

And time for all the works and days of hands

That lift and drop a question on your plate;

Time for you and time for me,

And time yet for a hundred indecisions,

And for a hundred visions and revisions,

Before the taking of a toast and tea.

In the room the women come and go

Talking of Michelangelo.

And indeed there will be time

To wonder, “Do I dare?” and, “Do I dare?”

Time to turn back and descend the stair,

With a bald spot in the middle of my hair —

(They will say: “How his hair is growing thin!”)

My morning coat, my collar mounting firmly to the chin,

My necktie rich and modest, but asserted by a simple pin —

(They will say: “But how his arms and legs are thin!”)

Do I dare

Disturb the universe?

In a minute there is time

For decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse.

For I have known them all already, known them all:

Have known the evenings, mornings, afternoons,

I have measured out my life with coffee spoons;

I know the voices dying with a dying fall

Beneath the music from a farther room.

So how should I presume?

And I have known the eyes already, known them all—

The eyes that fix you in a formulated phrase,

And when I am formulated, sprawling on a pin,

When I am pinned and wriggling on the wall,

Then how should I begin

To spit out all the butt-ends of my days and ways?

And how should I presume?

And I have known the arms already, known them all—

Arms that are braceleted and white and bare

(But in the lamplight, downed with light brown hair!)

Is it perfume from a dress

That makes me so digress?

Arms that lie along a table, or wrap about a shawl.

And should I then presume?

And how should I begin?

Shall I say, I have gone at dusk through narrow streets

And watched the smoke that rises from the pipes

Of lonely men in shirt-sleeves, leaning out of windows? …

I should have been a pair of ragged claws

Scuttling across the floors of silent seas.

And the afternoon, the evening, sleeps so peacefully!

Smoothed by long fingers,

Asleep … tired … or it malingers,

Stretched on the floor, here beside you and me.

Should I, after tea and cakes and ices,

Have the strength to force the moment to its crisis?

But though I have wept and fasted, wept and prayed,

Though I have seen my head (grown slightly bald) brought in upon a platter,

I am no prophet — and here’s no great matter;

I have seen the moment of my greatness flicker,

And I have seen the eternal Footman hold my coat, and snicker,

And in short, I was afraid.

And would it have been worth it, after all,

After the cups, the marmalade, the tea,

Among the porcelain, among some talk of you and me,

Would it have been worth while,

To have bitten off the matter with a smile,

To have squeezed the universe into a ball

To roll it towards some overwhelming question,

To say: “I am Lazarus, come from the dead,

Come back to tell you all, I shall tell you all”—

If one, settling a pillow by her head

Should say: “That is not what I meant at all;

That is not it, at all.”

And would it have been worth it, after all,

Would it have been worth while,

After the sunsets and the dooryards and the sprinkled streets,

After the novels, after the teacups, after the skirts that trail along the floor—

And this, and so much more?—

It is impossible to say just what I mean!

But as if a magic lantern threw the nerves in patterns on a screen:

Would it have been worth while

If one, settling a pillow or throwing off a shawl,

And turning toward the window, should say:

“That is not it at all,

That is not what I meant, at all.”

No! I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be;

Am an attendant lord, one that will do

To swell a progress, start a scene or two,

Advise the prince; no doubt, an easy tool,

Deferential, glad to be of use,

Politic, cautious, and meticulous;

Full of high sentence, but a bit obtuse;

At times, indeed, almost ridiculous—

Almost, at times, the Fool.

I grow old … I grow old …

I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled.

Shall I part my hair behind?   Do I dare to eat a peach?

I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.

I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each.

I do not think that they will sing to me.

I have seen them riding seaward on the waves

Combing the white hair of the waves blown back

When the wind blows the water white and black.

We have lingered in the chambers of the sea

By sea-girls wreathed with seaweed red and brown

Till human voices wake us, and we drown.

Questions on T.S. Eliot: 

  1. Who is the speaker of “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock“?
  2. The speaker compares the sunset to a “patient etherised upon a table.” Why do you suppose Prufrock would compare a sunset to some hospital patient who has been anesthetized and is waiting for an operation?
  3. The speaker refers to the surrounding cityscape as having “one-night cheap hotels” and “sawdust restaurants.” What is this part of town like, apparently?
  4. What is the yellow fog compared to in a simile? How is the fog like such a creature?
  5. What does Prufrock mean when he says, “There will be time, there will be time / To prepare a face to meet the faces that you meet”? Have you ever had to “prepare a face” before you have met someone? Why would one try to prepare an artificial face?
  6. Prufrock reassures himself that there will be “Time to turn back and descend the stair.” What does he mean by this, i.e., what can he do if he changes his mind? Why do you suppose T. S. Eliot chooses the verb descend rather than ascend? Does this connect with the Dante quotation about a guy trapped in hell in any way?
  7. Why doesn’t Prufrock compare himself to a complete crab? Why is a crab particularly appropriate for Prufrock generally? (Research about the way crabs travel and see how it matches the way Prufrock travels through life….)
  8. Why is Prufrock agonizing over how to wear his trousers?
  9. What’s odd about the way Prufrock contemplates combing his “hair behind”? Does one normally comb his hair from the rear to cover the forward part of the head? What does this suggest about the aging Prufrock’s hair and why he combs his hair forward this way?
  10. Why is Prufrock stymied by the thought of eating peach? Why would eating a peach in public be problematic for him
  11. Prufrock imagines himself under the water with the mermaids in “chambers of the sea.” What happens at the end though when he hears the conversation of human voices around him that awakens him from his daydream?

Week Four Discussion Forum

Week Four Discussion Forum

Discussion Question: 

In Week One, we looked at the view of Ruth Benedict (discussed in Chapter 3 of Rosenstand’s The Moral of the Story) a 20th-century anthropologist, who says that, “Normality…is culturally defined,” and “the concept of the normal is properly a variant of the concept of [the] good” (Benedict [from “Anthropology and the Abnormal (1934),]” qtd. in Rosenstand, p. 153, 7e). Benedict is saying that what any culture or society deems to be a good, right, or correct action and morally good, or at least morally appropriate, behavior will in fact be such in relation to the belief system and practices of that culture or society. This leaves the door open for a wide variety of ways of life, of ethical codes, of individual behavior to be acknowledged not only as acceptable, but also as morally good.

By contrast, Christina Hoff Sommers argues that there are basic human virtues that are not relative to time, place, circumstance or situation. Sommers writes, “It is wrong to mistreat a child, to humiliate someone, to torment an animal. To think only of yourself, to steal, to lie, to break promises, And on the positive side: it is right to be considerate and respectful of others, to be charitable and generous.” (Sommers, qtd. in Rosenstand, p. 486, 7e). Just after this passage, Rosenstand asks whether Sommers is right: “Can we just pronounce the virtues of decency, civility, honesty, and so forth the ultimate values without any further discussion?….For many, what Sommers is doing is just old-fashioned moralizing…” (p. 489). What does Rosenstand mean by “moralizing”? Explain your understanding of Sommers’s repudiation of moral and ethical relativism. Is her view convincing enough to make a relativist change her stripes? How does Sommers’s view connect up with virtue ethics? [Note: You can get a quick survey of Sommers’s viewpoint in brief video commentaries here:  https://www.aei.org/scholar/christina-hoff-sommers/]

-read the Chapter 10,11,12, then answer the question above

-In the essay-style forums responses, you should express a point of view and support your view with good reasons, evidence, examples, expert opinion, etc.

-two pages, MLA

What Happens To The Character Wearing The Hoodie At That Particular Moment? Is That Moment Significant? What Are The Ramifications For The Person Wearing It?

What Happens To The Character Wearing The Hoodie At That Particular Moment? Is That Moment Significant? What Are The Ramifications For The Person Wearing It?

Answer Case Question

Answer Case Question

Nike, as many other companies like Tesla, Lyft, Airbnb, Starbucks, along with numerous tech giants have raised their voice related to political concerns.  The information below offers some background and overviews of ​Nike’s controversial ad. ​ After critically reflection on the sources​, post your response to the following question: Is an organization taking a political stand an ethical dilemma? If so why, if not why not? Draw on course vocabulary to support your thoughts.

Are you aware of Nike’s controversial ad where they used a picture of Colin Kaepernick for their “just do it” advertisement? To understand this case, we need a little background knowledge about this football player.  Colin Kaepernick was a well-known NFL football player. In 2016 he choose to kneel on one knee rather than stand during the national anthem before a game as a sign of protest again injustice against African-Americans in the United States. At the pre-season game in 2016, Colin Kaepernicksat on his chair during the US national anthem, later, he kneeled to show his protest (Mindock, 2018, paragraph 6). He said: “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of colour,” (Mindock, 2018, paragraph 8).

Barack Obama was still in office that time and said that Colin Kaepernick has rights to protest. However, Donald Trump blamed Colin Kaepernick’ behavior in his rally in September 2017 (Chambers, 2018, paragraph 21). The words from Trump made this case more influential than before (Chambers, 2018, paragraph 21).  It is normal for athletes shows their dissatisfaction with politics, however, NFL disagreed with his behavior (Mindock, 2018, paragraph 4). Colin Kaepernick chose to leave the San Francisco 49ers and became a free agent (Chambers, 2018, paragraph 22).

For more information on this incident, please read the following article:

Fast forward and on September 5, 2018, Nike featured Colin Kaepernick as one of the faces for advertisements commemorating the 30th anniversary of its “Just Do It” slogan. Kaepernick posted a black and white Nike Ad on Instagram and Twitter with the words “Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything.” and the Nike’s slogan “Just do it.” On September 3, 2018. It made no direct reference to the kneeling movement.  Based on social media posts, people took offense in Nike hiring this “activist”. People who were against Kaepernick announced their intention to boycott Nike on social media.

Soon after there were comments supporting and criticizing Nike, so much so, that there were videos of people burning Nike shoes. American citizens who protested Nike were of the opinion that we cannot support a company that is disrespectful of the American flag and the national anthem.

After a short dip because of the boycott, Nike stocks reached an all-time high on Friday afternoon of September 14, 2018. Nike has historically taken a stand on controversial issues and is quite explicit about where it stands. Gino Fisanotti, a Nike vice president of brand for North America said, “We believe Colin is one of the most inspirational athletes of this generation, who has leveraged the power of sport to help move the world forward.” Nike later released a statement that the “social justice issues that Colin and other professional athletes have raised deserve our attention and action. … We embrace the role and responsibility of everyone involved with this game to promote meaningful, positive change in our communities.”​

For more on this, please visit the following links:

“It is also important to remember that our “organizational lives” are not separate or distinct from other realms of our lives. Increasingly, it is hard to distinguish between our public and private lives, work and family, labor and leisure (May, 1993). As a result, it is crucial that we keep in mind that organizations are a part of life. They are not silos that function in a vacuum without direct effects on all of us. For better or worse, they are part and parcel of us.” – Organizational Communication ed. 2, Steve May, pg. 2. With the millennials and gen z taking over, it would be wise to remember that this generation is most socially aware and politically involved.