quantitative statistic assignment

Click the link above to submit your assignment.

Assignment #1: JET Copies Case Problem

Read the “JET Copies” Case Problem on pages 678-679 of the text. Using simulation estimate the loss of revenue due to copier breakdown for one year, as follows:

  1. In Excel, use a suitable method for generating the number of days needed to repair the copier, when it is out of service, according to the discrete distribution shown.
  2. In Excel, use a suitable method for simulating the interval between successive breakdowns, according to the continuous distribution shown.
  3. In Excel, use a suitable method for simulating the lost revenue for each day the copier is out of service.
  4. Put all of this together to simulate the lost revenue due to copier breakdowns over 1 year to answer the question asked in the case study.
  5. In a word processing program, write a brief description/explanation of how you implemented each component of the model. Write 1-2 paragraphs for each component of the model (days-to-repair; interval between breakdowns; lost revenue; putting it together).
  6. Answer the question posed in the case study. How confident are you that this answer is a good one? What are the limits of the study? Write at least one paragraph.

There are two deliverables for this Case Problem, the Excel spreadsheet and the written description/explanation. Please submit both of them electronically via the dropbox.

The assignment will be graded using the associated rubric.

Outcome Assessed:
  • Create statistical analysis of simulation results.
  • Communicate issues in management science
Grading Rubric for JET Copies Case Problem
There are 12 possible points in each of the five criteria for a total of 60 points possible.

 

Criteria 0Unacceptable(0 points) 1Developing(6 points) 2Competent(9 points) 3Exemplary(12 points)
1. Model number of days to repair Did not submit or did not model this component in an appropriate manner This component was modeled, but the method and/or implementation had mistakes that affected the validity of the model Used a method that is recognizably appropriate, but the implementation had minor mistakes Used an appropriate method and correctly implemented it
2. Model number of weeks between breakdowns Did not submit or did not model this component in an appropriate manner This component was modeled, but the method and/or implementation had mistakes that affected the validity of the model Used a method that is recognizably appropriate, but the implementation had minor mistakes Used an appropriate method and correctly implemented it
3. Model lost revenue due to breakdowns Did not submit or did not model this component in an appropriate manner This component was modeled, but the method and/or implementation had mistakes that affected the validity of the model Used a method that is recognizably appropriate, but the implementation had minor mistakes Used an appropriate method and correctly implemented it
4. Provide written description and explanation of the simulation Did not submit or described insufficiently. Omitted key points. Provided partially developed written description that matches the method 70 – 79% accuracy. Provided sufficiently developed written description that matches the method 80 – 89% accuracy. Provided fully developed written description that is correct and matches the method used with 90 – 100% accuracy.
5. Combine model components to produce a coherent answer to the question posed in the case study. (a) Answer the question posed in the case study. (b) How confident are you that this answer is a good one? (c) What are the limits of the study? Did not submit or result not provided, and/or discussed insufficiently. Provided partially correct result. Omitted discussion of confidence. Discussed limitations partially with 70 – 79% accuracy, logic, and clarity. Provided sufficiently correct result. Identified confidence and discussed limitations sufficiently with 80 – 89% accuracy, accuracy, logic, and clarity. Provided fully correct result. Identified confidence and discussed limitations fully with 90 – 100% accuracy, logic, and clarity.

 

 678-679
JET Copies

James Banks was standing in line next to Robin Cole at Klecko’s

Copy Center, waiting to use one of the copy machines. “Gee,

Robin, I hate this,” he said. “We have to drive all the way over here

from Southgate and then wait in line to use these copy machines.

I hate wasting time like this.”

“I know what you mean,” said Robin. “And look who’s here. A

lot of these students are from Southgate Apartments or one of the

other apartments near us. It seems as though it would be more

logical if Klecko’s would move its operation over to us, instead of

all of us coming over here.”

James looked around and noticed what Robin was talking

about. Robin and he were students at State University, and most

of the customers at Klecko’s were also students. As Robin

suggested, a lot of the people waiting were State students who

lived at Southgate Apartments, where James also lived with Ernie

Moore. This gave James an idea, which he shared with Ernie and

their friend Terri Jones when he got home later that evening.

“Look, you guys, I’ve got an idea to make some money,” James

started. “Let’s open a copy business! All we have to do is buy a

copier, put it in Terri’s duplex next door, and sell copies. I know

we can get customers because I’ve just seen them all at Klecko’s.

If we provide a copy service right here in the Southgate complex,

we’ll make a killing.”

Terri and Ernie liked the idea, so the three decided to go into

the copying business. They would call it JET Copies, named for

James, Ernie, and Terri. Their first step was to purchase a copier.

They bought one like the one used in the college of business office

at State for $18,000. (Terri’s parents provided a loan.) The company

that sold them the copier touted the copier’s reliability, but

after they bought it, Ernie talked with someone in the dean’s office

at State, who told him that the University’s copier broke down frequently

and when it did, it often took between 1 and 4 days to get

it repaired.When Ernie told this to Terri and James, they became

worried. If the copier broke down frequently and was not in use

for long periods while they waited for a repair person to come fix

it, they could lose a lot of revenue. As a result, James, Ernie, and

Terri thought they might need to purchase a smaller backup

copier for $8,000 to use when the main copier broke down.

However, before they approached Terri’s parents for another loan,

they wanted to have an estimate of just how much money they

might lose if they did not have a backup copier. To get this estimate,

they decided to develop a simulation model because they

were studying simulation in one of their classes at State.

To develop a simulation model, they first needed to know how

frequently the copier might break down—specifically, the time

between breakdowns. No one could provide them with an exact

probability distribution, but from talking to staff members in the

college of business, James estimated that the time between breakdowns

was probably between 0 and 6 weeks, with the probability

increasing the longer the copier went without breaking down.

Thus, the probability distribution of breakdowns generally looked

like the following:

Next, they needed to know how long it would take to get the

copier repaired when it broke down. They had a service contract

with the dealer that “guaranteed” prompt repair service. However,

Terri gathered some data from the college of business from which

she developed the following probability distribution of repair times:

Repair Time (days) Probability

1 .20

2 .45

3 .25

4 .10

1.00

Finally, they needed to estimate how much business they would

lose while the copier was waiting for repair. The three of them had

only a vague idea of how much business they would do but finally

estimated that they would sell between 2,000 and 8,000 copies per day

at $0.10 per copy. However, they had no idea about what kind of

probability distribution to use for this range of values. Therefore, they

decided to use a uniform probability distribution between 2,000 and

8,000 copies to estimate the number of copies they would sell per day.

James, Ernie, and Terri decided that if their loss of revenue due to

machine downtime during 1 year was $12,000 or more, they should

purchase a backup copier. Thus, they needed to simulate the breakdown

and repair process for a number of years to obtain an average

annual loss of revenue. However, before programming the simulation

model, they decided to conduct a manual simulation of this process for

1 year to see if the model was working correctly. Perform this manual

simulation for JET Copies and determine the loss of revenue for 1 year.

 

nurse client relationships

PART ONENewman pointed out that, “nurse client relationships often begin during periods of disruption, uncertainty, and unpredictability in patient’s lives” (Smith & Parker, 2015, p. 288).Explore what she means by this statement. Then, reflect on a patient that you cared for that you could apply her theory to. Provide details of the interaction and outcomes.Your initial posting should be at least 400 words in length and utilize at least one scholarly source other than the textbookthe theorist referred to here is Betty NewmanPART TWOYour assignment this week will be an APA paper to include title page, level headings, and a reference page.Case study #1Mrs. Franklin-Jones was admitted from the Emergency Room to Cardiac Intensive Care one week ago with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. She has recovered as expected and is moving to the cardiac step down unit today. She is talking with Nurse Julie Hernandez, as she gets settled in her new room, “I was really surprised when I got that bad pain in my chest! I knew I had high pressure but I just didn’t think it was that bad. I try to take my medicine like they told me to in the clinic but sometimes I forget. I guess that I need to study those papers they gave me about what foods I should eat and not eat. I better take care of myself! Momma had bad pressure and it killed her! Who knows—I may even have to learn to cook different than I was taught in Jamaica! I may have to let Tomas do the cooking. He’s got more time at home now than I do since he lost his job. There isn’t too much time between my shifts at the school cafeteria and my new housecleaning job. You know my sister is coming up from Jamaica to see me. I think she is bringing me some bush tea. That’ll set me right!”Using Leininger’s Culture Care Model, what factors in the story shared by Mrs. Franklin-Jones should be considered by Nurse Hernandez when planning for the patient’s discharge?Why is the theory of Culture Care Diversity important in the delivery of nursing care for all patients?Using Leininger’s Theory of Culture Care Diversity and Universality, develop a plan of care for Mrs. Franklin-Jones.Discuss the strengths and limits to Leininger’s Theory.Case Study #2Claude Jean-Baptiste is recovering from post-hip replacement surgery and has been transferred to the Rehabilitation Institute adjacent to the hospital. When he enters the unit, he sees welcoming signs written in several languages including his own, Creole. Since there are no nurses on that shift that speak Creole, they use a language line to ask for translation services. During this initial nursing assessment, the translator informs Mr. Jean-Baptiste that the nurses invite him to have a relative at his side so that they can be sure to understand and meet his needs. He is asked about Haitian customs and beliefs that they might honor. Mr. Jean-Baptiste is encouraged to bring food and spiritual care items, and to share the warmth of his culture with the nursing staff.Discuss assumptions of the Transpersonal Caring relationship. What is the nurse’s role?How is love, as defined by Watson, evident in this caring moment?How can the nurse creatively use self to create a healing environment?Discuss the strengths and limits to Watson’s Theory.This paper should include 2 outside references and your book. The essay should be between 1500 and 1750 words in length.

 

CREDITORS’ RIGHTS AND BANKRUPTCY

How much time does Janet have after filing the bankruptcy petition to submit the required schedules?

Journal Entry – Chapter 15
Chapter 15: Creditors’ Rights and Bankruptcy – Chapter 15 – Journal Entry

Do not copy answers directly from the book or cut and paste from a site on the web.

Using **any** kind of Wiki, including Wikipedia, is not appropriate.

Please do your own work, in your own words, and use proper grammar and spelling, too.

Upload your journal entry to the drop box.

CREDITORS’ RIGHTS AND BANKRUPTCY (page 463)

Three months ago, Janet Hart’s husband of twenty years died of cancer. Although he had medical insurance, he left Janet with outstanding medical bills of more than $50,000. Janet has worked at the local library for the past ten years, earning $1,700 per month. Since her husband’s death, Janet also receives $1,500 in Social Security benefits, and $1,100 in life insurance proceeds every month, giving her a monthly income of $4,300. After she pays the mortgage payment of $1,500, and the amounts due on other debts each month, Janet barely has enough left over to buy groceries for her family (she has two teenage daughters at home). She decides to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, hoping for a fresh start.

Answer the following questions, using the information presented in the chapter.

Under the Bankruptcy Code after the enactment of the 2005 revisions, what must Janet do prior to filing a petition for relief under Chapter 7?
2. How much time does Janet have after filing the bankruptcy petition to submit the required schedules? What happens if Janet does not meet the deadline?

Assume that Janet files a petition under Chapter 7. Further assume that the median family income in the state in which Janet lives is $49,300. What steps would a court take to determine whether Janet’s petition is presumed to be “substantial abuse” under the means test?

Suppose that the court determines that no presumption of substantial abuse applies in Janet’s case. Nevertheless, the court finds that Janet does have the ability to pay a portion of the amount due on the medical bills out of her disposable income. What would the court likely order in that situation?
FOR TWO POINTS EXTRA CREDIT:

Rather than being allowed to file Chapter 7 bankruptcy petitions, individuals and couples should always be forced to make an effort to pay off their debts through Chapter 13. Do you agree or disagree and wh

The post How much time does Janet have after filing the bankruptcy petition to submit the required schedules? appeared first on My Nursing Paper.

 

Develop a plan

Develop a plan for how you would report about the outbreak to key stakeholders in your community.

Introduction:

With the increased mobility of human populations, diseases can quickly spread around the world. In addition, changes in vaccination practices have indicated an increase in communicable diseases that were once thought to be under control. These global health issues present new problems for community health officials. In this task, you will analyze a specific, recent outbreak of a global communicable disease that has crossed international borders (i.e. TB outbreak, Haiti to U.S.). Choose one of the following communicable disease outbreaks to address in your task:

• avian influenza
• measles
• respiratory syndrome coronavirus
• meningococcal disease
• tuberculosis
• malaria

Note: If you are a student who does not reside in the state of California, you were incorrectly enrolled in this performance assessment and should be enrolled in a different one. Please contact Ecare@WGU.edu to rectify this error.

Requirements:

A. Analyze the selected communicable disease outbreak by doing the following:
1. Describe a specific, communicable disease outbreak.

Note: This may include the name of the disease, countries involved, date discovered, and date disease reached certain countries.

2. Analyze the epidemiological determinants of the outbreak.
a. Discuss the route of transmission of the disease causing the outbreak.
b. Discuss any risk factors involved.
3. Discuss how the outbreak could affect your community at a systems level (i.e., how it will affect the functioning of schools, local government, businesses, hospitals).
4. Explain what the reporting protocol would be if an outbreak were to occur in your community.
5. Develop a plan for how you would report about the outbreak to key stakeholders in your community.
6. Discuss strategies (e.g., patient education strategies, community education strategies) that you would recommend to prevent an outbreak in your community.

B. Include all in-text citations and references in APA format.

Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section.

Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assessment.

Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from outside sources, even if cited correctly. For tips on using APA style, please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the APA Guidelines section.

The post Develop a plan for how you would report about the outbreak to key stakeholders in your community. appeared first on My Nursing Paper.

 

Familism and a Changing Society

Familism and a Changing Society

THIS DISCUSSION SHOULD BE NO LESS THAN 300 WORDS AND APA FORMAT

  • Many regard the family as a real strength in the Latino community, but is this always the case?  What are the positive and negative aspects of familism?
  • Research the web for information on familism.  Does familism promote psychological well-being?  Do men or women benefit more from familism?
  • Around the world, it appears familism is coming to an end.  What are the economic, political and cultural implications of the changes underway in the traditional family unit?
  • What are your experiences with family?  Are you familiar with the concept of familism?  How do you personally feel about extended family and how it affects family life and career? (IM AFRICAN AMERICAN)

 

sociology

Write a 1500-2000 word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to thoroughly answer all the questions for each bullet point. There should be three sections, one for each bullet below. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least three (3) citations in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. Also, include an introduction and conclusion. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount.Section One: Of the three theoretical perspectives, which one would you prefer to use if you were a sociologist? Why?Section Two: Considering the macro- and micro-level approaches in sociology, which one do you think better explains social life?  Why?Section Three: After reviewing the six influential sociologists from the textbook this week – Auguste Comte, Harriet Martineau, Herbert Spencer, Karl Marx, Émile Durkheim, and Max Weber, pick one and discuss their contribution to sociology. Why was their contribution important, and is it still relevant today?Assignment Expectations:

 

part

  1. In the late 1960s, Milton Friedman and Edmund Phelps argued that there was not a structural relationship between inflation and unemployment rates.  In particular, the trade off could only exist in the short -run.

a)     (10 points) The tradeoff between unemployment and inflation was much discussed throughout the 1960s as there appeared to be a clear tradeoff between unemployment and inflation. In fact, we traced out the Phillips curve beginning in the  early 1960s and continuing through the end of the decade.  In the space below, recreate the Phillips curve that we constructed in the lectures, being sure to label diagram completely.  At minimum, you should have unemployment / inflation combinations for 1961, 1962, 1964, 1966, and 1969.  Connect the dots and we have the tradeoff between unemployment and inflation during the 1960s, aka, the Phillips curve.

b)     (10 points) Now explain why the Phillips curve that you constructed can only be a short-run phenomenon at best.  In particular, explain exactly why, as we went through the decade of the 1960s, we continuously move up and to the northwest along the Phillips curve…. from relatively high rates of unemployment and low inflation to relatively low rates of unemployment and high rates of inflation.  In your answer, make sure discuss the short run aspect of this curve and why, in the long-run, the Phillips curve is vertical (hint: expected inflation, unexpected inflation, actual real wages, and expected real wages should be a big part of your explanation).

  1. In this question, we are going dig deeper into the Taylor Rule and it variants (modifications).  You will need the following links to answer the following questions. Note, each link takes you to a page where right above the graph on left, there is a “download data in graph” tab – click on it and that will give you access to the data you need. 

NAIRU                                                                                                                GDP Growth

PGE                                                                                                                     Inflation PCE core

Unemployment Rate                                                                              Inflation PCE

Effective Federal Funds Rate

As Taylor assumed, we assume the equilibrium real rate of interest, r* = 2% and the optimal inflation rate, the target inflation rate is also equal to 2%.

a)     (10 points) Using the ‘standard’ Taylor rule with Inflation PCE (not the core), and using end of 2011 data (2011-10-01) what is the federal funds rate implied by the ‘standard’ Taylor Rule?  According to the actual federal funds rate (use the Effective Federal Funds Rate), is the Fed being hawkish or dovish? Explain. 

b)     (10 points) Repeat part a) using the modified version of the Taylor using the unemployment gap instead of the GDP gap just like we did in the lectures. Also, use the PCE core rate of inflation instead of overall inflation like you used above – the Fed arguably cares more about core inflation than overall inflation.  According to the actual federal funds rate (use the Effective Federal Funds Rate), is the Fed being hawkish or dovish? Which “Taylor” rule explains Fed behavior better, the original or the modified Taylor Rule? Explain. 

c)     (10 points) Let’s go back in time to the fourth quarter of 1965 (1965-10-01) when the “We are all Keynesians” was featured in Time magazine.  We argued that this was heyday of Keynesian economics so we would expect to get dovish results.  Using the original Taylor Rule that you used in part a) and the modified Taylor Rule that you used in part b), prove that the Fed was dovish according to both versions of the Taylor Rule.

d)     (10 points) We now go back to the Volcker period where he was known as being a hawk on inflation. Using the data from the second quarter of 1982 (1982-04-01), prove that the Volcker Fed was hawkish according to both versions of the Taylor Rule

 

Topic 15-16 D

helpInstructions for Discussion Replies to 6 DQSDO NOT JUST REPEAT SAME INFORMATION, DO NOT JUST SAY I AGREE OR THINGS LIKE THAT. YOU NEED TO ADD NEW INFORMATION TO DISCUSSION.1- Each reply should be at least 200 words.2- Minimum One Peer reviewed/scholarly reference ( NO MAYO CLINIC/ AHA)3- APA 7th edition style needs to be followed.4- Each response should have reference at the end of each reply5- Reference should be within last 4 years

 

State of the Science Quality Improvement mobile apps monitoring CHF reducing readmissions

This assignment provides the opportunity for the graduate nurse practitioner student to become familiar with research processes which are specific to quality improvement.  The graduate nursing student will develop a State of the Science Evidence-Based Practice Project that is focused on quality improvement.Note: The process began in Week 2 with the formation of a PICO question. Week 4 was Part 1 of the paper which laid the ground work for the project. Part 2 of the Project in Week 6 adds the following elements:  Abstract, Review of the Literature (State of the Science), strengths and limitations of current evidence, and development of a quality enhancement (improvement) plan that addresses limitations of current practice evidence.Activity Learning OutcomesIntegrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings (CO1)Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve healthcare outcomes (CO2)Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies (CO4)Due Date:Sunday by 11:59pm MT at the end of WEEK 6Part 1 and 2 should be submitted as the final paperStudents are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.Total Points Possible:  200ptsRequirements:Preparing the Assignment:  Part 2 Criteria for ContentAbstract:The abstract should be succinct, comprehensive, and follow and include these APA components (accurate, non-evaluative, coherent, readable and concise).A description of the problem under investigation (one sentence), participants, and essential features of the quality improvement project which include setting, supporting theory, stakeholders and outcome measurements that would be used to determine efficacy of quality improvement project are included.(See APA 6th ed., for abstract examples and explanation; p. 25-26)State-of-the-Science Review of the Literature (ROL):See Polit & Beck, 2018, 9th ed., Ch. 7 for description of ROL.This section will describe the state of the science related to the PICO question and problem statement, purpose of the quality project.A minimum of 6 (six) appropriate research-based scholarly references (articles) must be used.  Required textbook for this course, dictionary and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may be used but will NOT count as scholarly references for this assignment.  For additional assistance regarding scholarly nursing references, please see “What is a scholarly source” from the Chamberlain Library resources.  Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.  References are current if within a 5-year time frame (3 years is best) unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them prior to submission of the assignment.The evidence should be critically reviewed and synthesized.The strengths and limitations of the current evidence and current practice are described which provide evidence for practice change clearly supportedThe identified area of issue or gap in practice is made clear using evidence and is compelling and significant.No more than three (3) direct quotes are used.Quality Change Plan:In this section the writer will create an inter-disciplinary quality improvement plan for their future practice area.  The JH Action Planning Tool may be used as a guide but is not required to be submitted along with the project.  This section should be supported by scholarly in-text citations and include the following sections:Feasible plan for implementation: Select a model for use, such as the Plan/Do/Study/Act Model.Identification of key stakeholders with rationale for identification.Identification of appropriate interdisciplinary team members to assemble with rationale.A plan for outcome analysis (this should include independent and dependent variables as well as an overview of a method of statistical analysis (which statistics or outcome measures).Ethical considerations: Protection of Human Subjects.Criteria for Format and Special Instructions:Page length:  Part 2 of the paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be 10 pages maximum.Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific, scholarly writing.  First person writing should not be utilized.Remember:  All sections should have scholarly resources integrated as in-text citations that support the content.  APA current edition is required for all elements of the paper.Rubric Glossary of Achievement TermsComprehensive:Of Large Scope, Covering or Involving Much; InclusiveComprehending or thoroughly understanding with one’s mind; having an extensive mental range or grasp of aparticular subject.Thorough:Detailed, accurate, carefulAttentive to detail, accurate, but less than comprehensive in scope, depth or inclusivitySuperficial:Not thorough, on the surfaceOf little substance, lacking thoroughnessIll-Prepared / Un-structured:Inadequately prepared, lack of care for detailLacking organization, disorganizedSuccinctExpressed in few words, verbal brevityCompressed expressionWebster’s Online Dictionary:  Retrieved from https://www.dictionary.com/ASSIGNMENT CONTENTCategoryPoints%DescriptionAbstract4020%Abstract is succinct and comprehensive, follows and includes the APA (accurate, non-evaluative, coherent, readable and concise).A description of the problem under investigation (one sentence), participants, and essential features of the quality improvement project which include setting, supporting theory, stakeholders and outcome measurements that would be used to determine efficacy of quality improvement project are included.(See APA 6th ed., for abstract examples and explanation; p. 25-26)State of the Science ROL5025%Review of the LiteratureA minimum of 6 (six) appropriate research-based scholarly references (articles) must be used.The evidence should be critically reviewed, compared and contrasted, and synthesized.The strengths and limitations of the current evidence and current practice are described which provide evidence for practice change clearly supportedThe identified area of issue or gap in practice is made clear using evidence and is compelling and significant.No more than 3 direct quotes are usedQuality Change Plan7035%Quality Change PlanInter-disciplinary Quality Plan Supported by Scholarly In-text Citations and include the following sections:Feasible plan for implementation: Select a model for use, such as the Plan/Do/Study/Act    Model.Identification of key stakeholders with rationale for identification.Identification of appropriate interdisciplinary team members to assemble with rationale.A plan for outcome analysis (this should include independent and dependent variables as well as an overview of a method of statistical analysis (which statistics or outcome measures).Ethical considerations: Protection of Human Subjects.Summary/ Appendix2513%The conclusion restates the main sections of the paper.  It should contain a few sentences from each section, sequentially representing the flow of the paper.  The last few sentences of the summary section should pull the paper together by addressing an overview for future projects or by stating the projects importance and implications for practice.The appendix includes the Johns Hopkins PICO question formation and ROL tools.18593%Total CONTENT Points= 185 ptsASSIGNMENT FORMATCategoryPoints%DescriptionAPA, Syntax, Grammar, Spelling1515Page length:  Part 2 of the paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be 10 pages maximum.Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific, scholarly writing.  First person writing should not be utilized.Remember:  All sections should have scholarly resources integrated as in-text citations that support the content.  APA current edition is required for all elements of the paper.157%Total FORMAT Points= 15 pts100%ASSIGNMENT TOTAL=200 pointsRubricNR505NP SOS Part 2_SEPT19NR505NP SOS Part 2_SEPT19CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbstractAbstract is succinct and comprehensive, follows and includes APA components:Accurate, non-evaluative, coherent and readable, concise.Describes the problem under investigation (one sentence), participants, essential features of the quality improvement project to include setting, supporting theory, stakeholders and outcome measurements that would be used to determine efficacy of quality improvement project.40.0 ptsExcellentAbstract is succinct and comprehensive, follows and includes APA components: Accurate, non-evaluative, coherent and readable, concise. Describes the problem under investigation (one sentence), participants, essential features of the quality improvement project to include setting, supporting theory, stakeholders and outcome measurements that would be used to determine efficacy of quality improvement project.36.0 ptsV. GoodAbstract is thorough but not comprehensive in in general or in one or two areas: Accurate, non-evaluative, coherent and readable, concise. Describes the problem under investigation (one sentence), participants, essential features of the quality improvement project to include setting, supporting theory, stakeholders and outcome measurements that would be used to determine efficacy of quality improvement project.33.0 ptsSatisfactoryAbstract superficially addresses all APA components or may be missing two components (for example, setting, theory or stakeholders).20.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementAbstract is ill-prepared, unstructured, and is missing most of the major components per APA0.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryAbstract is missing completely or is ill-prepared, does not address the APA abstract components.40.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeState of the Science: Review of the Literature (ROL)1. A minimum of 6 (six) appropriate research-based scholarly references (articles) must be used.2. The evidence should be critically reviewed, compared and contrasted, and synthesized.3. The strengths and limitations of the current evidence and current practice are described which provide evidence for practice change clearly supported4. The identified area of issue or gap in practice is made clear using evidence and is compelling and significant.5. No more than 3 direct quotes are used50.0 ptsExcellentComplete, comprehensive, and scholarly analysis that meets all elements of the requirements for the ROL Zero to three (0-3) direct quotes are utilized.45.0 ptsV. GoodThorough, but not comprehensive, analysis, scholarly, meets all elements of the requirements for the ROL Zero to three (0-3) direct quotes are utilized.41.0 ptsSatisfactorySuperficially presented, scant analysis, meets all or most elements of the requirements for the ROL or may be thorough in 2-3 requirements but be missing depth or content in other areas Zero to three (0-3) direct quotes are utilized.25.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementLimited analysis. Presents literature without connecting to quality project. Does not utilize a critical review to support project’s purpose. May also contain greater than three (3) direct quotes.0.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryROL is missing completely or is ill-prepared, does not address any of the ROL components or is limited to a superficial discussion of 1-2 components of the Criteria for Content for the ROL. May also contain greater than three (3) direct quotes.50.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality Change PlanInter-disciplinary Quality Plan Supported by Scholarly In-text Citations and include the following sections:1. Feasible plan for implementation: Select a model for use, such as the Plan/Do/Study/Act Model.2. Identification of key stakeholders with rationale for identification.3. Identification of appropriate interdisciplinary team members to assemble with rationale.4. A plan for outcome analysis (this should include independent and dependent variables as well as an overview of a method of statistical analysis (which statistics or outcome measures).5. Ethical considerations: Protection of Human Subjects.70.0 ptsExcellentThe quality change plan has comprehensive depth that is evidence by integration of scholarly resources throughout all required sections which are comprehensively included. Content provides rationales for all sections with definitions, explanations, for decisions, planning.64.0 ptsV. GoodThe quality change plan is thorough but not comprehensive in depth that is evidence by either missing integration of scholarly resources throughout all sections or, two (2) sections (for example) may be vague. Content provides rationales for most sections and includes definitions, as well as explanations, for decisions, planning.58.0 ptsSatisfactoryThe quality change plan has superficial in depth that is evidence by a consistent lack of integration of scholarly resources throughout all sections. Content provides rationales that are superficial and/or inconsistently with inconsistent definitions, as well as explanations, for decisions, planning.35.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementThe quality change plan has limited depth that is evidence by an overall lack of integration of scholarly resources throughout all sections. Content does not provide rationales for sections with definitions, explanations, for decisions, or planning. Or, rationales, definitions, explanations for planning are brief without focus or clear connection to project question/aim.0.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryThe quality change plan lacks depth and focus as evidence by an overall lack of representation in all sections.70.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary/ AppendixThe conclusion restates the main sections of the paper. It should contain a few sentences from each section, sequentially representing the flow of the paper. The last few sentences of the summary section should pull the paper together by addressing an overview for future projects or by stating the projects importance and implications for practice.The appendix includes the Johns Hopkins PICO question formation and ROL tools.25.0 ptsExcellentThe summary pulls the paper together comprehensively, including elements of each part of the State of the Science Quality Improvement Paper. The appendix contains both the PICO Question Formation Tool and the ROL Table which are complete23.0 ptsV. GoodThe summary is thorough, including elements of each part of the State of the Science Quality Improvement Paper. The appendix contains both the PICO Question Formation tool and the ROL Table which are complete or missing 1 or 2 components of the tool (for instance, one or two components of the ROL table)21.0 ptsSatisfactoryThe summary is brief including elements of each part of the State of the Science Quality Improvement Paper OR the summary is thorough but does not address all elements of each part of the SOS paper. The appendix contains both the PICO Question Formation tool and the ROL Table which are complete or missing 1 or 2 components of the tool (for instance, one or two components of the ROL table)13.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementThe summary is quite limited in all elements of each part of the State of the Science Quality Improvement Paper. The appendix contains both the PICO Question Formation tool and the ROL Table OR may be missing one tool OR both tools are present but are incomplete or unorganized.0.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryThe summary is missing or incoherent. The appendix is missing.25.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA/Syntax/Grammar/ Spelling1. Page length: Part 2 of the paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be 10 pages maximum.2. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.3. Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.4. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific, scholarly writing. First person writing should not be utilized.Remember: All sections should have scholarly resources integrated as in-text citations that support the content. APA 6th edition is required for all elements of the paper.15.0 ptsExcellent1 error total in any area.13.0 ptsV. Good2-4 errors total in any area.12.0 ptsSatisfactory5-7 errors total in any area.8.0 ptsNeeds Improvement8-10 errors total in any area.0.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryGreater than 10 errors total in any area.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductionsStudents are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.0.0 ptsManual Deductions0.0 ptsManual Deductions0.0 pts

 

read case 8 page 463 write 5 8 page paper addressing following

Read the Case #8 on page 463. Write a 5-8 page paper addressing the following:

What is the current state of Eastman-Kodak?
How can an organization which had 80% of the market at a certain point, fail?
What opportunities & why did Kodak miss them?
What did the competition do differently?
Why did Kodak fall so far behind?
What caused Kodak’s demise?
What role did Kodak’s leadership play?
What would you suggest Kodak have done?
What would you suggest Kodak do now (2013)?
Follow APA formatting. Use at least three (3) other sources besides the text.