Develop a presentation that presents a story grammar script and post it into the Forum.
WARNING!!!!
This is masters level work. Please do not accept if you are not capable of performing to standard. I dispute work that I am not happy with.
Suppose you take cash from your piggy-bank (or sofa cushions) and deposit it into your checking account in the Singleton Bank thereby removing this currency from circulation. Does this have the effect of reducing the money supply? Explain your reasoning.
no plagiarism or work done before for other students
300words only…7 hours from now. or less.
2 sources
Macroeconomics
Need an research paper on the global warming and coral reefs. Needs to be 6 pages. Please no plagiarism. One of the most productive, diverse, and valuable ecosystems on earth (Notes), coral reefs are the highest primary producers of all ecosystems. . They are storehouses of immense biological, economic, and cultural wealth and are thus of great importance and the subject of hundreds of research papers, global symposiums, monitoring networks (Jackson et al., 2012). . Both documents focus on predicting how increasing sea temperatures and ocean acidification can lead to the collapse of these systems in the future. . . Both papers discuss the mechanisms at play, including increasing temperatures resulting in more bleaching events and disease and ocean acidification from increased CO2 uptake reducing reef growth and calcification. . It is evident from these research papers that climate variation and rates of change of CO2 are the drivers behind the potential collapse and point to the anticipated future global warming scenarios leading to such failure as predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ICCP) (ICCP, 2007). . It is just a matter of when and where.
Research Methods
The first paper, ENSO, delivers a palaeoecological approach by investigating the Pacific reef-building framework’s history and comparing it to current climate variability and CO2 emissions trends. . . . This primary field research consisted of obtaining push core samples from reef habitats in the Pacific Panama region. . From these samples, the researchers could then clearly define a hiatus in coral reef growth 2500 years ago by observing a drastic change in the type of sediments in the sample core. . The samples showed a clear shift from coral building skeletons to non-building coralline algae rubble. This data is then correlated with the large swings in ENSO exhibiting as El Nino and La Nina events and coupling with the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ). . .
The second paper, CLIMATE, primarily focuses on interpreting other data specifically from the Vostok Ice Core study (5) and the EPICA (6) study. . There is limited field study in this paper predominantly proving the trend of carbonate accretion as CO2 rises. . Rates of change are essential in this paper as it concludes that “modern…. corals do not appear to have the capacity to adapt to sudden environmental change” (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2007). This research paper then models a coral dominated equilibrium versus an algal-dominated equilibrium different system and the combinations of coral cover and grazing that permit each. .
How to write the CRA (make sure to include all of the parts, 1-5):
1. CITATION: For each text or chapter of text in each reading assignment, provide the full citation information at the beginning of the CRA (name, title, publication, date, page).
2. PASSAGES: Select two (2) passages (about 1-2 good sentences) from each text or chapter of text to respond to. For example, if you are assigned 3 chapters in one text, then you should have two passages from each chapter for a total of 6 passages. Type the passage in italics surrounded by quotation marks, followed by the proper MLA citation.
3. RESPONSES: Beneath each selected passage, write your response to it, saying as much as you can.
Example below: (the assigned text is a scholarly article)
Schunk, D.H. “Self-efficacy and Classroom Learning.” Psychology in the Schools 22.2 (1985): 208-223. ERIC. Accessed 2 Mar. 2015.
(1) “teacher feedback that points out correct operations and remedies troublesome tasks helps students understand their mistakes and validates correct answers” (Schunk 7).
I get so discouraged when teachers mark my papers wrong but they don’t make any comments or explanations about why it’s wrong. This passage makes me think that…………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
The purpose here is to practice reading-to-write and making your thinking visible by taking your active reading a step further and thinking more deeply about your initial responses to the text. A good response will take at least a paragraph to explain your thinking.
4. RHETORICAL ANALYSIS: After you have written all of the passages and responses for the reading assignment, think about the choices that lead the author (or each author) in writing this text? Identify the rhetorical elements of the text and speculate about what problems or questions drive the author. This is NOT to be a summary. The rhetorical analysis section is for you to practice thinking about and responding to the choices the author makes in point-of-view, audience, genre, tone, appeals and purpose and how those choices affect the message of the text. A good analysis will take at least 1-2 paragraphs.
5. FURTHER INQUIRY: After you have completed all of the passages and responses and the rhetorical analysis for the reading assignment, include a final section where you propose two (2) new intellectual problems or questions the reading raises for you. These should be points of FURTHER INQUIRY, sometimes
taking you deeper into the text and sometimes taking you outside of the text to related issues. This section is designed to help you practice and learn to identify which of your responses/reactions have potential for productive writing, and which may not. (Each new problem/questions should be a minimum of 2 sentences).
*Please make each section of your CRA clear and obvious and label appropriately. The following is an example that you may use as a template, or you can format your own with similar clarity.
(Example Moody; Stegner)
Moody, Rick. “The Joy and Enthusiasm of Reading.” This I Believe. Joy Allison and Dan Gediman, Eds. New York: Holt, 2007. 159-161.
(1)“Blah, blah blah blah, blah……….” (Moody 3).
This passage about blah makes me think about…..
(2)“Yadda yadda yadda yadda, ya yadda…”(Moody 1).
The idea of yadda yadda yadda makes me wonder if…..
Rhetorical Analysis: I think that the author is writing from the perspective of __________ and that he uses _________ to explain __________. I think that the problem he saw was __________ and he wanted to find a way to __________ by using __________. Moody’s purpose behind the text is to __________ and __________, etc…
Stegner, Wallace. “Everything Potent is Dangerous.” This I Believe. Joy Allison and Dan Gediman, Eds. New York: Holt, 2007. 234-236.
(1) passage & response
(2)““
Rhetorical Analysis: Here I feel the author is………..
(at the end of your passages and rhetorical analysis, on the last page, last paragraph,
end with Further Inquiry questions)
Further Inquiry
1. If __________ is true, then why would…………?
2. The idea of __________ doesn’t seem complete; what about _________ and ___________?
*CRA’s should be 2-3 pages long and are due on the day we discuss the texts in question.
Course Project—Annotated Bibliography
Topic Domestic Violence
The annotated bibliography will present an introduction and five reference citations with annotations. The purpose of the annotated bibliography is to determine the appropriateness of the sources to the argument you are developing for the Course Project. The format of the proposal is an introductory paragraph followed by an alphabetized list of sources with two paragraphs of annotation after each source. Use APA documentation to document any sources referenced in your proposal. When you are finished, save the document as <your last name. Wk4 Annotated Bibliography> and submit it to the Dropbox by the end of the week.
The Annotated Bibliography is worth 100 points. See Doc Sharing for the following support documents.
Before you turn in your assignment, proofread and edit carefully for spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Not every error will be flagged automatically in word-processing programs, and some that are flagged as errors are actually correct.
The Annotated Bibliography is worth 100 points and is due at the end of the week in the Dropbox.
View the tutorial on formatting a Word document, which can be found in THE|HUB.
Submit your assignment to the Dropbox, located at the top of this page. For instructions on how to use the Dropbox, read these step-by-step instructions.
See the Syllabus section “Due Dates for Assignments & Exams” for due date information.
Instructions My Position is Heath Information Manager Director
Bring your own device to work is becoming more popular every day. Please present the pros and cons of BYOD to work. Then choose a side and provide support for your position. Be sure to address the ethical and security issues.
Your essay should be around 2 pages of content in APA format, 12 font, and should include a 5 space indentation for all paragraphs with double spacing. An abstract is not required, but a cover sheet will always be a requirement. Please cite any sources found per APA. Always list references, if only the text.
I’m studying and need help with a Psychology question to help me learn.
Read the following article on ethical issues in forensic evaluations: Ethical Issues in Conducting Forensic Evaluations.
In your initial posts to your peers, discuss some of the major ethical issues that arise when conducting forensic evaluations and how they can impact the outcomes. What does it mean to be competent? How does it impact an evaluation? How do you think one becomes competent?
In response to your peers, think about your ideas of competence and if they differ. Do you think this plays into the field professionally? Do you think it impacts the weight of an evaluation?
To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document.
As a scholar-practitioner, it is important for you to understand that just because a hypothesis test indicates a relationship exists between an intervention and an outcome, there is a difference between groups, or there is a correlation between two constructs, it does not always provide a default measure for its importance. Although relationships are significant, they can be very minute relationships, very small differences, or very weak correlations. In the end, we need to ask whether the relationships or differences observed are large enough that we should make some practical change in policy or practice.
For this Discussion, you will explore statistical significance and meaningfulness.
To prepare for this Discussion:
What is your response to the scenario in which you critically evaluate this footnote. As a reader/reviewer, what response would you provide to the authors about this footnote?
Select a topic for your assignment from the list of potential recommendations below:
• Expansion of a business (retail, food, services, and so on) to another location(s)
• Improving a firm’s sales and profit
• Improving a company’s customer services
• Implementing flexible scheduling
• Reduction of business costs
• Implementing sustainability measures across the company
• Informal dress-down Fridays
• Technology (software and hardware) changes across the company
• A business or workplace problem developed using the Virtual Organization site
• Another topic as approved by your instructor
Part I
Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word Research-Driven Formal Report (follow the model offered in Ch. 18 of Workplace Writing) that proposes a change to the workplace or proposes a new initiative using the components of ethical business communication.
Your report should look similar to the example in Ch.18 of Workplace Writing, although it will only contain some, not all, of the sections listed in the chapter. It must include the following headings:
• Title page
• Introduction
• Discussion
• Conclusion/Recommendation
• Reference Page
Note. The cover page and references pages will not count toward your final word count.
If you have not done so already, refer to the outline template posted in Week 3 for some ideas about what elements belong in each section.
Format your paper consistent with appropriate course-level APA guidelines.
FYI – All the point are supposed to lie on the indifference curves for these questions even if they appear a touch off.
Based on the budget constraint and 3 indifference curves shown here we know that:
A.10 apples and 10 pizzas is not feasible but provides more utility than the best feasible bundleB.10 apples and 10 pizzas is not feasible and provides less utility than the best feasible bundleC.10 apples and 10 pizzas is feasible but not utility-maximizingD.10 apples and 10 pizzas is feasible and utility-maximizing
Please explain answer in detail if possible!
Our payment system is secure and efficient. We guarantee your security and 100% refund as per the guidelines