For this discussion, find an example of a security breach which compromised data records at a company in the same industry as you will be using in your final paper. Summarize the breach, discuss the data that was lost and identify security controls that y

I need help with a Computer Science question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

According to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; and hence, privacy cannot be protected without implementing proper security controls and technologies. Today, organizations must make not only reasonable efforts to offer protection of privacy of data, but also must go much further as privacy breaches are damaging to its customers, reputation, and potentially could put the company out of business. As we continue learning from our various professional areas of practice, its no doubt that breaches have become an increasing concern to many businesses and their future operations.

For this discussion, find an example of a security breach which compromised data records at a company in the same industry as you will be using in your final paper. Summarize the breach, discuss the data that was lost and identify security controls that you would recommend be in place (be certain to remember to cite sources) that could have prevented this breach from occurring.

Note:

APA format

400-500 words

4 Pages Case Studying Paper

I’m stuck on a Management question and need an explanation.

Case: Marc Kasky versus Nike

Background: The case of Kasky v Nike is about Marc Kasky who filed a lawsuit against Nike in California state court in 1998 suing the company for unfair and deceptive practices under California’s Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law. Nike claimed that the statements were noncommercial speech on matters of public concern and thus were constitutionally protected. Nike responded to the charges in numerous ways, such as by issuing press releases. Kasky alleged that Nike’s public statements regarding the working conditions in its overseas suppliers’ factories contained false information and material omissions of fact concerning the working conditions under which its products are manufactured. In May 2002, Kasky appealed against the lower court’s decision to the California Supreme Court. They found 4-3 in favor of Kasky that Nike violated sections of the Business and Professions Code. Then on June 26, 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to rule on Nike’s appeal. In September 2003, The case was settled out of court.

Need to answer the following questions:

1.How does the decision of the side taken by each stakeholder affect business-­‐government-­‐society?

2.Which side do you think is right, and why?

3.What would you have done differently?

Minimum 4 pages, and APA Reference Format.

Topic: Partner Violence

I need help with a Nursing question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

Topic: Partner Violence

2 full pages (cover or reference page not included)

APA norms

It will be verified by Turnitin

References not older than 5 years

1. Interventions Strategies / Treatments (pharmacological and non-pharmacological)

2. Other considerations in the management of Partner Violence (including but not limited to management of behaviors, family considerations, challenges in the care of patients with this social issue.

One of the ugly stepsisters argues that she, rather than Cinderella, should go to the ball because she will derive more utility from it than…

1. One of the ugly stepsisters argues that she, rather than Cinderella, should go to the ball because she will derive more utility from it than Cinderella. An economist would:

                a. agree, since the ugly stepsister’s reasoning is sound. 

                b. want to know how much utility each will receive from attending the ball in order to determine which woman should attend. 

                c. point out that making interpersonal utility comparisons is not possible.             

                d. ask how many balls each woman has attended in order to calculate the marginal utility that each would derive from attending, and then decide who should go to the ball.          

2. The law of diminishing marginal utility states that:

                a. total utility decreases as consumption of a good increases.     

                b. total utility increases as consumption of a good increases.      

                c. the increase in total utility from consuming an additional unit decreases as consumption increases.    

                d. the increase in total utility from consuming an additional unit increases as consumption increasThe law of diminishing marginal utility states that:

3. A university cafeteria changes from offering all-you-can-eat meals for one low price to selling each food item separately. After this change, one would expect that the marginal utility of the last food item consumed in the cafeteria by the typical student would:

                a. decrease since less food is now likely to be consumed by students who eat a meal in the cafeteria.    

                b. increase since less food is now likely to be consumed by students who eat a meal in the cafeteria.     

                c. not change since the same quantity of food is now likely to be consumed at each meal.           

                d. decrease since more food is now likely to be consumed by students who eat a meal in the cafeteria.

4. Economic analysis that focuses on bounded rationality and psychological insights is known as:

                a. behavioral economics.             

                b. Keynesian economics.             

                c. Austrian economics.  

                d. supply-side economics.

5. Which of the following is an example of a concept from behavioral economics?

                a. compartmentalizing  

                b. the endowment effect           

                c. behavior based on perceived fairness               

                d. all of the above           

6. Which of the following is an example a lack of self-control that contradicts the conclusions of standard economic analysis?

                a. Eating more food at an all-you-can-eat buffet               

                b. Playing video games all night even with an exam the following morning that will determine your semester grade   

                c. Decreasing the purchase of steak if the price increases 25%   

                d. all of the above           

7. When people alter their preferences when a choice is presented in a certain way, it is called:

                a. anchoring      

                b. framing          

                c. the endowment effect            

                d. compartmentalizing  

8. The idea that when we own something we value it more than other people do is called:

                a. self control    

                b. anchoring      

                c. compartmentalizing  

                d. the endowment effect

9. If you win money in a casino you may be more likely to spend that money than your hard-earned cash.  This is called:

                a. compartmentalizing  

                b. self control   

                c. rule of thumb               

                d. anchoring

10. The term used to describe a more realistic conception of human problem-solving that assumes less than perfect analysis is:

                a. framing.         

                b. compartmentalizing.

                c. countercyclical policy.               

                d. bounded rationality.

Sociology Discussion Question

DUE TOMORROW AT NOON… Please only respond if you are able to complete for the price listed ($5.00). Just need two paragraphs with source.

This week we’ll review the Big Religions Chart and we’ll reflect on the different philosophies.  In doing so, we’ll apply our knowledge of world religions.   For our discussion, please address the following:

  • Go to Religion Facts and review the religion charts. If the link does not open for you (or expires), you can go online and search “Religions Chart”.
  • Summarize two religions from the chart. What similarities did you notice?
  • In your opinion, is religion a form of social control? In what ways can this be positive?

Explain whether we should accept Socrates’s argument to stay in prison, rejecting Crito’s proposal to escape and live. Does Socrates provide a sound argument for fulfilling his social contract with the Laws of Athens? Or, does Socrates have a greater obli

I’m studying for my Philosophy class and need an explanation.

Required Reading: Plato’s “Crito” (Weblink)

This reading follows the trial of Socrates as it was conferred by Plato’s Apology. Socrates is visited in prison by his lifelong friend, Crito – for whom the dialogue is named – awaiting his death sentence. Begin this discussion board by reviewing “Socrates and the Law: Argument in an Athenian Jail” (Links to an external site.). Only concern yourself with the “Learning Objectives” in the “Lesson Plans” section of this link. Then review the following video after you have completed reading the Crito -> Socratic Citizenship: Plato, Crito (Links to an external site.)

Explain whether we should accept Socrates’s argument to stay in prison, rejecting Crito’s proposal to escape and live. Does Socrates provide a sound argument for fulfilling his social contract with the Laws of Athens? Or, does Socrates have a greater obligation to preserve his own life through escaping?

Recommended Reading: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: “Plato’s Shorter Ethical Works – Section 12 (Links to an external site.)

Remember: A response consists of more than one word or simply agreeing. Please cite all passages in the text (including page number) and cite all outside information according to MLA guidelines. Your answer should have AT LEAST 3 responses (possibly more), aside from your original post. You will always be required to create a post responding to the discussion prompt (300-600 words), before viewing any responses of other students. Please review your work carefully before you submit since you will not be allowed to edit it afterwards (i.e., type and edit your responses in a WordDoc before posting.) Additionally, each discussion board requires you to respond to at least three other students (50-100 words per response).

Required Reading: http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/crito.html

https://www.iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/

You can also read the recommended reading for more information. Please DO NOT forget to cite all information page number, name, etc.. Most Importantly this discussion needs to be formatted in MLA ESSAY NOT answered as a question.

share the quote or piece of writing that you find meaningful with the class and include an explanation as to why this quote is significant to you and…

share the quote or piece of writing that you find meaningful with the class and include an explanation as to why this quote is significant to you and what you think it means. If possible, provide a link to the work or quote for others to gain information.

The Things They Carried” by Tim O Brien,

Research paper, english and composition

  • The Things They Carried” by Tim O Brien,

Research paper,

“The Things They Carried” by Tim O Brien,

Psychological and structuralism theory approach.

at least 4 pages.

MLA format

Research paper, english and composition

  • The Things They Carried” by Tim O Brien,

Research paper,

“The Things They Carried” by Tim O Brien,

Psychological and structuralism theory approach.

at least 4 pages.

MLA format

If a country has an absolute advantage in two products and has a comparative advantage in only one product, what should it do?

If a country has an absolute advantage in two products and has a comparative advantage in only one product, what should it do? A. Produce both products and export them to maximize its returns. B. Specialize in the product it has a comparative advantage in and import the other. C. Produce both products and export the cheapest and import the most expensive. D. Produce both products and export the most expansive and import the cheapest.

conflict management

I don’t understand this Communications question and need help to study.

Purpose: To identify your conflict management style ( from the completed questionnaire) and the style of the person that you are engaged in conflict with, and how changing styles influence the outcome.

Method: Answer all of the questions below using complete sentences.Each question will be valued at 5 marks.

Reflection:

Part A: what happened?

  • Briefly describe a conflict that you were engaged in in the past
  • Choose a conflict that was not resolved. Provide enough detail to give the conflict context i.e. situation, relationship
  • What were you thinking and feeling at the time?
  • Describe what was good and bad about the situation.
  • What conflict style did you choose to use? and why?
  • What conflict style did the other person choose to use? Can you identify why?
  • Choose an alternate style that moves the exchange in a positive direction and explain why you believe that this approach would have been a more effective choice.
  • What challenges might you have to overcome if you had used a different approach? Be specific.
  • How do you think the person you were engaged in conflict with might have responded to this different approach?
  • What sense can you make of the situation?
  • Provide three specific strategies that you could apply to future conflicts that would produce a more positive outcome.

Part B: what did I learn? Use the information that was discussed in class, the questionnaire and text.

Part C: Reflection

PLEASE MAKE SURE TO INCKLUDED ALL PARTS ALSO PPTX QUESTION