Why or why not?450-500 words, 2-3 slides

Is the portrayal accurate? of the criminal justic accurate. Why or why not?b. 450-500 words, 2-3 slides AnsSelecting the right criminal and giving him the right and the correct justice is one of…

Hi please help!!! Show steps please thanks!!!!! thanks again

11. Suppose that the CPI is fluently Eflfl and was 40 in 19H}. Then wording t1} the CF], $1 in 1950 purchasedthe same number of goods and services asa. $4 113633!11. $3 today. e. $5 today.d. None of the above.

After World War II, the United States experienced a “baby boom” as birthrates rose dramatically between 1946-1964. Lower birthrates after 1965 mean that the now aging baby boom generation is larger than the generations before and after it. What effects will the aging of the baby boom generation have on the economy? 

Aging of baby boomers have significant impact on the economy. It has increased therequirement of financing social security and has proved to be the burden on the medical billscovered by Medicare….

I will pay for the following article What does Dreger suggest about the relationship between anatomy and identity in our society How does Dreger show that anatomy matters (2) in sometimes unexpected ways Dreger later suggests that the important problem of the twenty-first century wil. The work is to be 1 page with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. “One of us” by Alice Domurat Dreger What Dreger Suggests about Relationship between Anatomy and Identity in&nbsp.Our&nbsp.Society

Dredger explains how&nbsp.political&nbsp.and social identities relate to&nbsp.anatomy. In this book, Dreger looks into the uncommon forms of conjoined, and the&nbsp.widespread&nbsp.social views that&nbsp.take&nbsp.disability as a&nbsp.loss&nbsp.of physical integrity. This loss constitutes to a loss of freedom, will, and self hood. Dreger looks at the lives of conjoined twins and suggests the use of their lives as a way to improve the social and political relationship among people.&nbsp.Conjoined twins exhibit dual-consciousness. they&nbsp.develop&nbsp.a co-operative personality, whereby, an individual contributes to the life of a collective unit (Dredger 44).

Dreger also keenly observes social stigmas associated with&nbsp.race&nbsp.and disability. She describes how her adopted African American&nbsp.brother&nbsp.appeared disabled based on ethnicity. his skin&nbsp.colour&nbsp.was an anatomical impairment as viewed by the&nbsp.society&nbsp.and&nbsp.consequently&nbsp.limited his&nbsp.outstanding&nbsp.activities (145).&nbsp.Biomedical experts in the 19th century relegated women and blacks to the socially inferior.&nbsp.They claimed that, “Anatomy and physiology&nbsp.have been interrogated&nbsp.and the&nbsp.response&nbsp.is that, the&nbsp.Ethiopian or Canaanite (the African) is unfitted from his social organisation an”&nbsp.(Dreger, 148).

How Dreger shows that Anatomy Matters

Dreger reminds us that&nbsp.anatomy&nbsp.matters she points out how sometimes we wished to change the appearances and children’s&nbsp.look. She studies how surgeons&nbsp.decide&nbsp.on correcting anomalies through surgery yet what truly mattered was&nbsp.individual&nbsp.perception&nbsp.to the whole situation. Dreger introduces us to 20 or so pairs of conjoined twins who not only&nbsp.live&nbsp.a normal life but also are&nbsp.comfortable&nbsp.with their&nbsp.condition&nbsp.an excellent example the Siamese twins, the Bunkers, who married two sisters and had twelve children. They were successful farmers they died at age of 62.

Another example is the Cady girls, the cephalic twins, they learned to walk, dances, roller-skate. They became popular later in high school and in life. Dreger considers surgery not as a solution to the abnormalities problem rather we should learn to accept these situations as part of the society, and try to avoid fixing everything. She says, “Physical&nbsp.ability&nbsp.is determined&nbsp.by the interaction of&nbsp.our&nbsp.bodies with the environment and this&nbsp.fact&nbsp.applies for all&nbsp.humanity&nbsp.whether&nbsp.normal&nbsp.or physically challenged” (Dreger 145).

Dredger Mentions that the problem of the 21st century will be along&nbsp.anatomy&nbsp.identity&nbsp.line.&nbsp.What examples do&nbsp.you&nbsp.imagine&nbsp.she is talking about?

Dreger believes values such as individualism, self-improvement, free&nbsp.enterprise&nbsp.and high tech medicine in&nbsp.combination&nbsp.creates an alternative in which people&nbsp.employ&nbsp.medical technology to&nbsp.alter&nbsp.ones&nbsp.anatomy, and make it socially&nbsp.favourable. This&nbsp.idea&nbsp.also applied in reproductive technology enables genetic screening, prenatal testing, selective abortion and pre-implantation embryo&nbsp.selection&nbsp.that already is in use to many prospective parents. These parents go through technological and social&nbsp.encouragement, discouraging them on having children who&nbsp.exhibit&nbsp.social challenging anatomies (Dreger 143).

Dreger, in this case is referring to cosmetic procedures such as breast implants, Botox injections, weight loss programs, cosmetics designed to reduce pores, even the skin tone, the target being to create a&nbsp.favourable&nbsp.identity, to become socially&nbsp.valuable. What consumers do not know is that this medical technology may be more dangerous than helpful (143).

Work Cited

Dreger, Alice Domurat. One of Us: Conjoined Twins and the Future of Normal. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004. Print.

Ashford 6: – Week 5 – Final Argumentative Essay

Global Societal Problem, Argument and Solution

Prepare: The topic of your essay needs to be a global societal problem from the following list: adult illiteracy, funding for General Education vs STEM in primary and secondary schools, minimum wage, oceans desertification, overcoming the digital divide, refugee (escaping persecution, war, or death) crises, species extinctions (modern), tax havens, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), universal statement of human rights (pick one), airport security, or wealth disparity. Review this GEN499 Sample Final Paper Guide for additional guidance on the expectations of this assignment.Reflect: Based on the topic that you have chosen, you will need to use critical thinking skills to thoroughly understand how this topic can be a global societal problem and determine some logical solution(s) to the problem.Write: This Final Argumentative Essay will present research relating the critical thinker to the modern, globalized world. In this assignment, you need to address the following items in separate sections with new headings for each:

• Identify the global societal problem within the introductory paragraph and conclude with a thesis statement that states your proposed solution(s) to the problem. For guidance on how to construct a good introduction paragraph, please review the Introduction Paragraph Guideline from the Ashford Writing Center.
• Describe background information on how that problem developed or came into existence. Show why this is a societal problem, and provide perspectives from multiple disciplines or populations so that you fully represent what different parts of society have to say about this issue.
• Construct an argument supporting your proposed solution(s). Be sure to consider multiple disciplines or populations so that your solution shows that multiple parts of society will benefit from this solution. Provide evidence from multiple scholarly sources as evidence that your proposed solution is viable.
• Interpret statistical data from at least three, peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Do this by discussing the validity, reliability, and any biases; identifying the strengths and weaknesses of these sources; and pointing out limitations of current research and attempting to indicate areas for future research. You may even use visual representations such as graphs or charts to explain statistics from sources. Evaluate the ethical outcomes that result from your solution. Be sure to provide at least one positive ethical outcome as well as at least one negative ethical outcome that could result from your solution, and explain at least two ethical issues related to each of those outcomes. It’s important to consider all of society.
• Develop a conclusion as the last paragraph(s) of the essay, starting with rephrasing your thesis statement and then presenting the major points of the topic and how they support your argument. For guidance on how to write a good conclusion paragraph, please review the Conclusion Paragraph Guideline from the Ashford Writing Center.

The Final Argumentative Essay

• Must be 3,300 – 3,900 words in length (approximately between 10 – 12 pages; excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
• Must include a separate title page with the following:
  • Title of paper
  • Student’s name
  • Course name and number
  • Instructor’s name
  • Date submitted
  • Running header with page numbers
• Must include in-text citations from at least 10 scholarly sources. Be sure to integrate your research rather than simply inserting it.
• Must document all sources in APA style as outlined here and here.
• Must have no more than 15% quoted material in the body of your essay based on the Turnitin report. Reference list will be excluded from the Turnitin originality score.
• Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
• Source Document Requirements:
  • Multimedia sources (such as videos) may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. If multimedia sources are used, they must be authored and distributed by credible sources, such as universities, law schools, medical schools, or professors, or found in the Ashford University Library.
  • Government sources may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. Examples include whitehouse.gov, state.gov, usa.gov, cdc.gov, etc. These websites can be used to make a stronger point about your proposed soluation within the argument.
  • Where print documents are used for source materials, those must be peer-reviewed, scholarly journal articles, and academically published books. Popular media sources (e.g., newspapers, magazines, television and radio shows, etc.) must not be used. Materials from advocacy groups (e.g., Greenpeace, Human Rights Campaign, National Organization for Women, etc.) must not be used.
  • Sites such as ProCon.org and Wikipedia must not be used.
  • Religious texts must not be used.

Good Critical Thinking Tips:

• Your paper should include academic sources that explain multiple sides of the issue.
• Your interpretations of the evidence should be objective and state the conclusions and theses presented in the evidence clearly and fairly.
• Your paper should place the various forms of evidence in relation to one another and demonstrate why one form or perspective is stronger than the other positions that one could take on the issue.
• Your paper should point out the limitations of current evidence and attempt to indicate areas for future research.
• Writing Tools:
  • Before you submit your written assignment, you are encouraged to review the The Grammarly Guide: How to Set Up & Use Grammarly tutorial, set up a Grammarly account (if you have not already done so), and use Grammarly to review a rough draft of your assignment. Then carefully review all issues identified by Grammarly and revise your work as needed.