Introduction:

The research paper is an original essay presenting your ideas in response to information found in library sources. As you gather research material, your ever-increasing knowledge of a topic will allow you to make informed judgments and original interpretations. At each stage of research, you will have a complete idea of what you have already found and what you are looking for. Midway through the process, the writing tasks of creating a review of the literature and a proposal will help you focus the direction of your research. This chapter addresses both the technical skills of finding and recording information and the intellectual skills of understanding the material, developing original ideas, and making informed judgments.

Requirement:

You are required to select three different topics in the field of Architecture or urban design, and prepare abstract and keywords for all of them.

Submission regulation;

Abstract :

All the 2 proposals must have an abstract, which should not exceed one page; should be single-spaced and not paragraphed. The abstract should consist of a precise spectrum of the entire proposal including the problem, objectives and methodology and data analysis methods.

Research Questions:

A list of questions (3-5) that might be raised during the research and the researcher will work to answer some of them.

Keywords:

Minimum three keywords for each Research Topic

Book: Heart Berries by Terese Marie Mailhot (use any online sources and no need to cite them!)

– Please answer questions regarding your choice for the 1st 8 Week Book.

– Answer any three questions from the list for your book.

Questions for Heart Berries

1. Does the process of writing her memoir generate for Mailhot a burgeoning sense of redemption? Does her story follow the typical arc from suffering to happiness or not.
2. In a Q&A with Joan Naviyuk Kane, Mailhot insists that she doesn’t “feel liberated from the governing presence of tragedy.… [W]e are not liberated from injustice; we’re anchored to it.” What does she mean? Can anything reverse or correct the injustices done to indigenous people?
3. Think about what we have learned about ethos so far. What strategies does Mailhot employ to make her reader trust what she is saying is true? What makes Mailhot a credible narrator?
4. Think about what we have learned about pathos so far. What strategies does Mailhot employ to make her readers feel a certain emotion in her work?

In the midst of the war, the Union held a presidential election, with incumbent Republican Abraham Lincoln squaring off against the Democratic candidate George McClellan. Shortly after Lincoln’s reelection and inauguration, however, he was assassinated, serving only a little more than a month of his second term.

Using the readings and film as evidence, consider the following in a post of at least 250 words:
•What were the main political issues facing the candidates in the 1864 presidential election?
•Based upon your research, was Lincoln’s reelection in 1864 seriously in question?

Human Resource Management in the International Firm: The Framework

The principle of internal consistency refers to the way in which the HR practices work together and with other parts of the work organization. How would a company develop a program that reflects the local cultural environment of India as compared to the parent organization’s overall values? How might cultural views on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, and disability impact the program? What strategies could a company devise to overcome biases in management style and communication that could adversely affect employee retention and organizational decision making? How could the company counter the type of bias found in India that relates to an aging workforce, religion, gender, and reverse discrimination?

Your responses should be a minimum of 300 words. Provide scholarly sources to support your response

Write responses for debate 9.2 10.2 10.3.

First, before reading the debate, note if you are for or against the statement (before reading the debate, do you agree more with the pro or con position?). Then note if your position changed or remained the same after you read the debate (after reading the debate, do you agree more with the pro or con position?) Give any insights on the debate or debate topic.